MRSA Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about MRSA, including details on methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, hospitals, infection, antibiotic resistance, superbugs.

Cost analysis of a hospital-wide selective screening programme for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) carriers in the context of diagnosis related groups (DRG) payment.

Wernitz MH, Keck S, Swidsinski S, Schulz S, Veit SK

Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin, Germany. martin.wernitz@vivantes.de

The costs of a hospital-wide selective screening programme were analysed for a period of 19 months. During this time, 539 inpatients were screened, of whom 111 were MRSA-positive. Based on microbiological costs (staff and materials) and the costs of preventive contact isolation for 2 days until microbiological results were available (including material costs for medical consumable goods and the costs of additional nursing time), a total of 26,241.51 Euro was spent for the 539 patients screened. Based on cost units, the costs were 39.96 Euro for a patient found to be MRSA-negative and 82.33 Euro for a patient found to be MRSA-positive. Under the prospective diagnosis related groups (DRG) payment system in Germany, the costs of a prolonged hospital stay resulting from a hospital-acquired MRSA infection (HA-MRSA-I) are not reimbursed adequately by revenues, with a calculated average cost-revenue loss/patient with HA-MRSA-I of 5705.75 Euro. The screening programme was able to prevent 48% of predicted HA-MRSA-Is (35.2 patients with infection), thereby saving a predicted 200,782.73 Euro. After subtracting the screening costs, there was a net saving of 110,236.56 Euro annually. A sensitivity analysis of the break-even points for different screening frequencies and different MRSA incidence rates indicated that the screening programme became cost-effective at a low MRSA incidence rate, meaning that it can be recommended for most hospitals with an MRSA problem.

Published 10 May 2005 in Clin Microbiol Infect, 11(6): 466-71.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

© 2004-2008 MRSA Research Today. All Rights Reserved.