MRSA Research - Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus Aureus, Hospitals, Infection, Antibiotic Resistance, Superbugs

MRSA Research Today is a free monthly online journal that collates and summarizes the latest research about MRSA, including details on methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus, hospitals, infection, antibiotic resistance, superbugs.


MRSA Research Today

Home

View Latest Issue

Information About MRSA

Books on MRSA

Advertising in Research Today

View Other Research Today Publications



An audit demonstrating a reduction in MRSA infection in a specialised vascular unit resulting from a change in infection control protocol.

Thompson M

Department of Vascular Surgery, St George's Hospital, London, UK. matt.thompson@stgeorges.nhs.uk

INTRODUCTION: In 2003, 18% of all admissions to our vascular ward were colonised by MRSA, with an MRSA infection rate of 10.6%. Standard practice was to segregate patients with proven MRSA from the rest of the patient pool. After a prospective audit, regression analysis was used to identify factors that could stratify patients into high and low risk for MRSA colonisation. A change in isolation policy was introduced that segregated patients according to their risk of MRSA acquisition, and isolated all patients undergoing prosthetic vascular reconstruction. Antibiotic policy was also altered. This audit reports the impact of these changes on MRSA colonisation and infection rates. METHODS: The MRSA status of patients during 777 in-patient episodes was prospectively recorded during three time spans; period 1 (November 2002-April 2003) before the change in isolation and antibiotic policy and, periods 2 (August-December 2003) and 3 (October 2004-January 2005) after the change in policy. RESULTS: Hospital acquired MRSA colonisation was reduced from 10.6% in period 1, to 1.1 and 1.4% in periods 2 and 3, respectively (p<0.001). Similarly, MRSA infection rates fell from 10.6 to 2.9 and 0.9% over the same time frame (p<0.001). The most dramatic changes in MRSA infection rates occurred in patients undergoing aneurysm repair (MRSA infection 30.1% in period 1 vs. 3.9 and 2.9% in periods 2 and 3) and lower limb revascularization (31 vs. 0 vs. 4.2%). Stepwise regression analysis revealed that the system of isolation was a significant factor reducing MRSA infection and colonisation rates (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that a change in infection control policy can significantly reduce MRSA infection in a vascular unit.

Published 5 June 2006 in Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 31(6): 609-15.
Full-text of this article is available online (may require subscription).

Place a permanent text-link or advertisement here for just US$15.

© 2004-2008 MRSA Research Today. All Rights Reserved.



MRSA Research Today Archive:

Volume 1 (2004)
  Issue 1 (October)
  Issue 2 (November)
  Issue 3 (December)

Volume 2 (2005)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 3 (2006)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 4 (2007)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)
  Issue 10 (October)
  Issue 11 (November)
  Issue 12 (December)

Volume 5 (2008)
  Issue 1 (January)
  Issue 2 (February)
  Issue 3 (March)
  Issue 4 (April)
  Issue 5 (May)
  Issue 6 (June)
  Issue 7 (July)
  Issue 8 (August)
  Issue 9 (September)



MRSA Books

Good Germs, Bad Germs: Health and Survival in a Bacterial World

Good Germs, Bad Germs: Health and Survival in a Bacterial World